Boeing Co scored no new orders at all for their airplanes in January, the first time it has come up empty-handed in the beginning of the year since 1962, while its European rival Airbus had its strongest showing in at least 15 years, Reuters reported.
The US planemaker's sales chief, Ihssane Mounir, told reporters last Wednesday at the Singapore Air show: "China has reduced capacity by 70%; that is money, that is revenue. It was a slow January but it doesn't mean it is going to be a slow February or slow March, so watch this space. Some 777 and 787 deliveries for China delayed due to coronavirus, too early to say if epidemic will delay further aircraft orders, further company coverage". He also mentioned they are in talks with several potential customers for wide-body aircraft.
However, the problem is deeper than it might seem in the first place. The January orders could not fully reflect the coronavirus impact on the expected decline in passenger and cargo air traffic. More important is that Boeing's once best-selling jet, the 737 MAX, remained grounded following two fatal crashes in five months and long-lasting investigations of the causes that maybe hidden in the airplane software, according to numerous experts and the preliminary conclusions of the company itself.
Too many airlines have doubts whether the safety problem could really be fixed so quickly. On the other hand, at least they could wait the moment until the 737 MAX is cleared by regulators to fly again, which leave Boeing trailing Airbus and swallowing huge monthly financial losses. The Paris-based Airbus last week reported of booked gross orders for 296 aircrafts or 274 net orders after cancellations. Boeing Co Chief Financial Officer Greg Smith said on Wednesday that it will take at least a couple of years before 737 MAX production rate can reach the 57 units per month that the company was targeting before the airplane was grounded.
Pic 1. Boeing Deliveries and Net Orders vs Airbus in 2010-2019
Boeing Co delivered less than half planes in the first 11 months of 2019 as in the same period a year earlier, the specialists of the company reported in the year end: deliveries totalled 345 aircrafts in the 11 months ended November, compared to 704 last year and were also less than half the number delivered by European rival Airbus in the same period.
Pic 2. Boeing deliveries halved in first 11 months of 2019
Also, since 2018 summer, some engine problems at Britain's Rolls-Royce have rattled the production process of the new Boeing 787 Dreamliner model. In December 2019 Boeing Co's Starliner astronaut spacecraft landed in the New Mexico desert, according to the company information, after faulty software forced officials to cut short an unmanned mission aimed at taking it to the International Space Station. It capped a turbulent 48 hours for Boeing's botched milestone test of an astronaut capsule that is designed to help NASA regain its human spaceflight capabilities.
The Boeing Co, one of the top Dow Jones index drivers for many years, was the fourth-worst performer in the 30-member index in 2019. Many investors became cautious, but by the beginning of this year 13 out of 24 Reuters pole analysts rating the Boing's shares a "hold" while seven still saw it a "buy" and "strong buy". This may sound a little strange but at least for now Boeing's shares keep afloat despite all disappointing news. And they even recovered more than nine % in price for the last three weeks holding a longer run uptrend safe since 2016.
Pic 3. Boeing shares chart since November 2019
Pic 4. Boeing shares in the longer run trend since 2016
Pic 6. Airbus Group shares in the longer run since 2015
One may wonder how it could happen?
Probably, the "secret weapon" of Boeing Co is a huge military order Boeing won or intercepted in 2011. Since then, the Boing Company has a $35 bln contract to build 179 strategic KC-46 Pegasus air-to-air tankers by 2027. The Boeing KC-46 Pegasus is a military aerial refuelling and strategic military transport aircraft developed by Boeing from its 767 jet airliner. In February 2011, the tanker was selected by the United States Air Force (USAF) to replace older KC-135 Stratotankers, also produced by Boeing.
Only the first phase of the contract costs $3.5 billion to cover the construction of the first 18 tankers by 2017. But first aircraft was delivered to the Air Force in January 2019 only, The Forbes and The Seattle Times reported. Although the deadlines were postponed several times this does not seem to have affected the cost of the order. And Boeing also has some export bids for KC-46 Pegasus from Canada, India, Indonesia and Japan, as some other NATO countries (Poland, Norway and Netherlands) gave their preferences to Airbus since 2014, according to Defence News.
According to the same Defence News sources, the Air Force restricted the KC-46 from carrying cargo and passengers due to an issue with the floor cargo locks coming unblocked in flight. A fix to this issue was approved by the Air Force on 12 November 2019 with plans to install the new cargo locks on delivered aircraft in the upcoming weeks. As of December 20, 2019, four KC-46A aircraft have received the new cargo locks and the Air Force has closed the Category 1 deficiency and cleared the retrofitted aircraft for cargo and passenger operations.
The company still faces certain technical issues with a military aircrafts too, but the huge size of the contracts and a very strong position of Boeing's USAF customers in the American establishment probably makes many investors to consider these longer-run military contracts, and not civil contracts, as the main source of the company welfare. This makes it much more difficult to predict the behaviour of Boeing's shares price.
Analysis and opinions provided herein are intended solely for informational and educational purposes and don't represent a recommendation or investment advice by TeleTrade.
Indiscriminate reliance on illustrative or informational materials may lead to losses.
Risk Warning: Trading Forex and CFDs on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Prior to trading, you should take into consideration your level of experience and financial situation. TeleTrade strives to provide you with all the necessary information and protective measures, but, if the risks seem still unclear to you, please seek independent advice.
© 2011-2020 TeleTrade-DJ International Consulting Ltd
TeleTrade-DJ International Consulting Ltd is registered as a Cyprus Investment Firm (CIF) under registration number HE272810 and is licensed by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) under license number 158/11.
The company operates in accordance with Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID).
The content on this website is for information purposes only. All the services and information provided have been obtained from sources deemed to be reliable. TeleTrade-DJ International Consulting Ltd ("TeleTrade") and/or any third-party information providers provide the services and information without warranty of any kind. By using this information and services you agree that under no circumstances shall TeleTrade have any liability to any person or entity for any loss or damage in whole or part caused by reliance on such information and services.
TeleTrade cooperates exclusively with regulated financial institutions for the safekeeping of clients' funds. Please see the entire list of banks and payment service providers entrusted with the handling of clients' funds.
TeleTrade-DJ International Consulting Ltd currently provides its services on a cross-border basis, within EEA states (except Belgium) under the MiFID passporting regime, and in selected 3rd countries. TeleTrade does not provide its services to residents or nationals of the USA.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.