Much has been said about whether closing the economy as a consequence of the measures taken in order to achieve social restraint is the right way to go. The inevitable recession and even the possible deaths that could arise from it, end up being some of the arguments of the people who tend to favor another more flexible form of containment.
The reality is that the presence of these measures, which we see being implemented all over the world, promotes an abrupt and painful recession for everyone. However, the issue here is that the contraction of the economy becomes greater as more existing containment measures are put in place.
In a study published last week, dubbed Macroeconomics of Epidemics (2020), it was concluded that there is indeed a trade-off between a deeper recession in the short term and the consequences for human health, in particular, for the number of deaths caused by the epidemic. It is estimated that in the absence of containment policies, less than half a million people could be saved in the United States and also that the recession would be less pronounced in the short term. However, the most interesting economic point of view is that in the long-term, it would probably be more difficult to get out of this crisis (not so deep in the beginning, but a longer lasting crisis) and this could have a more negative impact on the country product when compared to a situation in which social containment measures would exist for a period of one year.
Interestingly, another empirical study came out last week that proves the model used in the above investigation. In Pandemics Depress the Economy, Public Health Interventions Do Not: Evidence from the 1918 Flu (2020) - which is based on the Spanish Pneumonic, which spread throughout the world in 1918 - it was discovered that the cities that intervened earlier and more aggressively did not have a worse development than the others and that they grew even faster after the pandemic had passed. It is possible to read that "this study indicates that non-pharmaceutical interventions (eg quarantine, school closures, etc) not only significantly decrease mortality, but also mitigate possible adverse economic consequences resulting from the pandemic". Basically, the high mortality present in regions where the containment measures were less hostile removed labor from the labor market as well as causing a reduction in consumption. Finally,
This concludes that perhaps there is no dilemma here and that our best solution to this problem is to adopt and respect all these measures of social restraint. It is possibly the best measure for public health and the health of our economy. Putting the economy aside as well, if all of this is done for the sake of human life, we must not put that value aside today so that others can live less well tomorrow. If our values have shelf life, then they are not values at all.
Analysis and opinions provided herein are intended solely for informational and educational purposes and don't represent a recommendation or investment advice by TeleTrade. Indiscriminate reliance on illustrative or informational materials may lead to losses.
We are ready to assist you in every step of your trading experience
by providing 24/5 multilingual customer support.
Risk Warning: Trading Forex and CFDs on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 75.19% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Prior to trading, you should take into consideration your level of experience and financial situation. TeleTrade strives to provide you with all the necessary information and protective measures, but, if the risks seem still unclear to you, please seek independent advice.
© 2011-2023 Teletrade-DJ International Consulting Ltd
This website is operated by Teletrade-DJ International Consulting Ltd, which is registered as a Cyprus Investment Firm (CIF) under registration number HE272810 and is licensed by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) under license number 158/11. Teletrade-DJ International Consulting Ltd is located at 88, Arch. Makarios Avenue, 2nd floor, Nicosia Cyprus.
The company operates in accordance with the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID).
The content on this website is for information purposes only. All the services and information provided have been obtained from sources deemed to be reliable. Teletrade-DJ International Consulting Ltd ("TeleTrade") and/or any third-party information providers provide the services and information without warranty of any kind. By using this information and services you agree that under no circumstances shall TeleTrade have any liability to any person or entity for any loss or damage in whole or part caused by reliance on such information and services.
TeleTrade cooperates exclusively with regulated financial institutions for the safekeeping of clients' funds. Please see the entire list of banks and payment service providers entrusted with the handling of clients' funds.
Teletrade-DJ International Consulting Ltd currently provides its services on a cross-border basis, within EEA states (except Belgium) under the MiFID passporting regime, and in selected 3rd countries. TeleTrade does not provide its services to residents or nationals of the USA.
Material posted here is solely for information purposes and reliance on this may lead to losses. Past performances are not a reliable indicator of future results. Please read our full disclaimer.CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 75.19% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.